🖋️Co-Governance Structure | The Institutional Engine of Decentralized Collaboration

4.1 Reconstructing Power: From Sovereign Logic to Signer Logic

Throughout human history, all order begins with the question of power distribution. Traditional finance centralizes power in governments, central banks, and institutions—forming a trinity of "sovereignty-money-regulation." Blockchain disrupted this foundation.

Oly ONE does not seek to repair centralization but rewrites the source of power entirely. We introduce a new participation logic: the Signer mechanism. Here, power stems not from capital or reputation, but from consensual action and institutional commitment.

Every signer is both participant and steward of the protocol. No permission or identity is required—only the act of signing the protocol and engaging in its operation, upgrades, and redefinition. This is not an extension of voting-based governance, but the execution of a civilizational contract.

Signing is not an operation; it is a commitment. Governance is not voting; it is the materialization of consensus.

The core of this system: power derives not from "who owns more" but from "who commits more." This shift from ownership to responsibility is the institutional revolution behind OlyONE's decentralized collaboration logic.

4.2 A Multi-Dimensional Signing System: Transforming Governance into Civilizational Co-Building

Traditional governance models often fall into the traps of low participation, high centralization, and slow updates. This stems from governance mechanisms being modeled as centralized replicas rather than network extensions.

Oly ONE establishes a multi-layered co-governance structure, including:

• Protocol Signers: responsible for parameter and contract module proposals and updates.

• Liquidity Signers: contribute capital to the ecosystem and influence its financial structure.

• Expansion Signers: participate in ecosystem development such as partnerships and market access.

• Culture Signers: contribute to the spirit of the protocol through content, narrative, and creativity.

This stratified, functional signing mechanism replaces the formalism of governance voting with a truly collaborative, sustainable, and self-evolving decentralized order grid.

Signing is empowerment; Co-governance is structure.

The goal is not to harmonize all opinions but to ensure the system is collectively maintained, continuously updated, and never-ending.

4.3 No Governors, Only Stewards of the System

"DAO" once carried the hope of freedom but often became a battlefield of capital interests. Most DAOs never resolved governance's core questions: Who defines the system? Who owns upgrade rights? Who bears responsibility?

Oly ONE's breakthrough is the elimination of the "governor" role. The system has no core team, no decision committees, no supernodes. All proposals, changes, and repeals are initiated by signers and executed through protocol-embedded logic.

We have built a mechanism where the protocol itself becomes the owner of the system:

• Any parameter change must pass an internal "stability verification."

• Every governance proposal must meet both participation and coordination thresholds.

• All major actions require on-chain recording and blackhole verification to ensure irreversibility.

This is not another form of "democracy" but a mechanism autonomy that transcends democracy and centralization. We do not believe voting resolves complexity—we believe structure reduces it. In Oly ONE, governance is not enacted by people but operated by the system itself.

4.4 Participation Is Power, Consensus Is Authority

In Oly ONE, no one is a bystander; every action forms part of the protocol. Power is not allocated by capital or governance, but generated directly through participation.

Every signer contribution—whether through liquidity, narrative, proposals, or cultural dissemination—is recognized and reflected as system points. These are not rewards, but institutional credentials representing consensus weight.

This mechanism creates an unprecedented source of authority: shifting from willpower to participation intensity. We reject the illusion of "governance representatives" and instead trust the immutability and transparency of every on-chain action.

Ultimately, we are building a financial civilization model driven by signer action and sustained by the will of the system.